Useful facts about The Revelation Of Pyramids Documentary

Uncovering the Mysteries of the Great Pyramid of Giza: A Groundbreaking Discovery

The Great Pyramid of Giza has captivated minds for millennia, but many unclear facts about its construction have been dismissed without proper investigation. Determined to uncover the truth, I embarked on a quest that took me beyond anything I could have imagined. The following relies entirely on verifiable facts, and this groundbreaking discovery will forever change the way you look at this ancient wonder.

Eight Astounding Feats of the Great Pyramid’s Builders

Before constructing the Great Pyramid, the builders raised a hillock to the ground and left a giant pivot in its center. Around this pivot, they precisely cut a 6,000-hectare bedrock to fit uniquely-shaped slabs, each weighing as much as a large truck, like pieces of a gigantic jigsaw puzzle. This crucial first stage is rarely mentioned in construction theories.

The builders transported 130 granite blocks weighing between 12 and 70 tons each over 500 miles from the Aswan quarries. These massive blocks were then hauled up 210 feet to build the King’s Chamber – a feat that would be extremely challenging even with modern technology and heavy machinery.

Despite its immense size, the Great Pyramid contains only three chambers – the subterranean chamber, the Queen’s chamber, and the King’s chamber. These rooms are connected by a 300-foot long, 3-foot wide passageway bored through solid rock with breathtaking precision. According to architect Jean-Pierre Houdin, cutting this narrow passageway at a constant slope would have required specialized tools to maintain the same precise geometry throughout the construction process.

Mind-Boggling Precision and a Staggering Work Pace

The builders stacked over 2.3 million stones of various shapes and sizes with machine-like precision. Each block weighs as much as a car, yet the joints between them are seamless. The King’s Chamber is perfectly horizontal and vertical, with a margin of error of only 1/50th of an inch. This is an astounding level of precision considering that a 1/3 inch deviation would have gone unnoticed.

Incredibly, the Great Pyramid has withstood at least three major earthquakes over the millennia, including one that leveled Cairo in the 13th century AD. Yet the structure remains intact, with not a single stone out of place in the inner chambers. This is testament to the builders’ amazing anti-seismic engineering techniques.

The Great Pyramid is oriented to the cardinal directions with an accuracy of 5/100ths of a degree. Only in recent times have we matched this level of precision. In the 17th century, using the same ancient Egyptian methods, surveyors were five times less accurate.

Astonishingly, the Great Pyramid actually has eight sides, not four. Each of the four main faces has a slight concavity or indentation along its center. Maintaining this subtle eight-sided geometry as the pyramid rose would have been extremely difficult, as no two blocks are exactly alike. This mind-boggling feature greatly complicates the structure.

An Impossible Construction Schedule?

Mainstream Egyptologists claim the Great Pyramid was built in just 20 years during the reign of Pharaoh Khufu of the 4th Dynasty (c. 2580-2560 BC). However, a simple calculation reveals the implausibility of this scenario.

To build the pyramid in 20 years, crews would need to have laid over 12 blocks per hour, day and night. Each block had to be quarried, transported, carved to fit, raised into place, and set with perfect precision – all within 5 minutes, using primitive copper chisels, rollers, sleds, ramps, levers and pulleys. Even with today’s technology, this would be an impossible pace to sustain.

What’s more, the ancient Egyptians had not yet invented the wheel, discovered iron, or domesticated the horse. They are said to have relied solely on raw manpower, sleds, rollers, ramps, levers, and pulleys made of wood, rope, and soft copper. And they had no hard-cased bronze tools, only soft tin and copper.

The 20-year construction schedule defies logic when compared to other ancient building projects. For example, the Mayan El Castillo pyramid in Mexico, which is less than half the height of the Great Pyramid, took an estimated 150 years to complete using similar primitive technologies.

Egyptologists Have No Answers

When confronted with these facts, Egyptologists have no rational explanations. They rely on vague assertions that the ancient Egyptians were brilliant engineers and architects who organized their workforce with great skill. But these generalizations do not address the specific logistical and engineering challenges involved in the Great Pyramid’s construction.

For comparison, consider two modern construction projects that illustrate the enormous scale of the undertaking:

In the 1960s, a consortium of 23 nations led by the United States joined forces to save the ancient Abu Simbel temples along the Nile River from being submerged by the Aswan Dam reservoir. Over 5 years, using the latest technology like chainsaws, bulldozers and cranes, they cut the temples into 2,200 blocks weighing up to 30 tons each, moved them 200 feet up a cliff face, and reassembled them precisely in their original orientation. A total of 2,200 blocks in 5 years.

Now compare that to the Great Pyramid – over 2 million blocks, some weighing over 70 tons, quarried, transported and lifted up 480 feet in 20 years, using only sleds, ramps, levers, and copper chisels. No cranes, no iron tools, no wheels, no pulleys. The feat is simply impossible by the accepted timeline.

Egyptologist can offer no explanations for how this was achieved. When pressed for specifics on ancient construction techniques, they have only drawings and small-scale models to show, never any full-scale demonstrations or recreations of the purported methods.

The Nova Pyramid-Building Experiment – A Dismal Failure

In 1991, the PBS television program Nova attempted to build a scale model of the Great Pyramid using primitive technologies. The show was trumpeted as proving that ancient Egyptians could have constructed the monument as claimed.

However, the project was an embarrassing failure. Despite using modern tools like saws, wheel barrows, drills, and dynamite, the builders were unable to quarry or move huge blocks, let alone stack them with precision. The model they built had 1-centimeter gaps between the blocks, not the seamless joints found in the real pyramid.

To avoid total humiliation, the Nova show never revealed the model’s final height. It only reached a few stories tall before being abandoned. Even this small unfinished model required a crew of 100 men laboring for many weeks.

Flinders Petrie, the renowned British Egyptologist, calculated that if ancient Egyptians had built the Great Pyramid as claimed in just 20 years, a block would need to have been perfectly quarried, transported, and set in place every 2 minutes, day and night, for 20 years straight. An impossible pace even today.

Inescapable Conclusions

The evidence is overwhelming that the Great Pyramid could not have been built in 20 years using primitive tools as claimed by Egyptologists. This scenario is physically and logistically impossible, and has never been demonstrated or proven in even small-scale recreations.

The only rational conclusion is that the ancient Egyptians of the 4th Dynasty did not build the Great Pyramid. It must have been constructed either by a far more technologically advanced civilization, or over a much longer period than 20 years, or both.

Egyptologists have no credible answers for the numerous engineering mysteries of the Great Pyramid. Their entire narrative rests on unsupportable assumptions and imaginative drawings rather than demonstrated facts.

A new investigation unbound by dogma is urgently needed to determine who really built the Great Pyramid, when, and how. The implications of the truth could dramatically alter our understanding of history and the origins of civilization. We must boldly follow the evidence wherever it leads.